Try “Claude Code skills”, “MCP servers for Cursor” or “Codex” · Esc to close

Qodo 🤖 Agent Paid

AI code review and governance agents for teams

AI code review agents · Paid from $30/mo

7.6editor score
Visit Qodo ↗
🔥 Deal: Free access for qualified open-source projects Claim deal ↗

Works with

About Qodo

What it does

Qodo, formerly CodiumAI, is an AI code review and governance platform for engineering teams. It reviews pull requests inside your Git provider, posts summaries and structured findings, and enforces your organisation's coding standards. Its current documentation centres on the Qodo Review product rather than the test-generation tools it was first known for.

What is inside / how it works

Qodo splits a review between several specialist agents that run in parallel covering bugs, standards, architecture and risk. A judge agent merges their results, removes duplicates and filters by confidence before anything is posted. A Context Engine indexes the codebase so the review can flag issues that cross modules or services, and a beta feature indexes past pull requests to learn which kinds of findings your team actually acts on. A central rules system enforces security, style and architecture policies, and cross-repository review is available. The Agentic Toolbox exposes skills so coding agents can fetch the relevant rules, review local changes before a pull request and resolve Qodo's findings.

Works with

Pull request reviews run on GitHub (cloud and Enterprise Server), GitLab, Bitbucket Cloud and Azure DevOps, with Gerrit on Enterprise plans. The Agentic Toolbox is documented for Claude Code, Codex and Kiro, through a CLI, agent skills, MCP or APIs.

How to install or start

Sign in with GitHub, Google or email, then connect a Git provider from the Qodo portal and install the app on your repositories. Enterprise customers can choose single-tenant or on-premises deployment.

Pricing

At the time of writing (September 2026), there is a 14-day free trial but no permanent free tier. The Pro Team plan, for up to 30 users, is billed monthly with no commitment and uses credit packs pooled across the team at $0.012 per credit; the smallest pack is 2,500 credits for $30, and larger packs are available. Enterprise pricing is custom. Qualified open-source projects can apply for free access. Plans have changed recently, so check the official pricing page.

Who should use it

Teams that care about consistent standards and governance across many repositories, including organisations that need self-hosting. Solo developers will find the lack of a free tier limiting.

code review testing

Pros

  • Reviews plus test generation
  • Team rules

Cons

  • Team pricing

Similar subagents & agents

All AI code review agents →

Open Code Review 🤖 AgentOpen source

Alibaba's AI code review CLI: deterministic pipeline plus LLM agent, line-level comments

★ 43k · +2.1k this week

8.1 Visit ↗

Brooks Lint 🤖 AgentOpen source

AI code review graded against twelve classic engineering books, with citations and health scores

★ 1.5k · +6 this week

7.8 Visit ↗

Popular searches