Amp vs ANUS (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Amp and ANUS stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Amp

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

8.2 /10

Pricing: Free plan, paid from $20/mo

Pros

Strong results on hard, multi-step tasks
Shared threads for team review
Subagents and AGENTS.md built in

Cons

Usage-based costs add up on large tasks
Fewer configuration knobs by design

Visit Amp ↗

ANUS

Free terminal coding agent that auto-routes between free LLM tiers

6.5 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

Costs nothing to run end to end by cycling across multiple providers' free tiers (OpenRouter, Gemini, Groq, Cerebras, Mistral) as rate limits hit
Active project with MIT license, transparent local key storage, and a model-ranking list that refreshes twice a day

Cons

Quality and availability depend entirely on whichever free tier is currently up, so behavior can vary day to day; some providers' free tiers use submitted data

Visit ANUS ↗

Amp vs ANUS at a glance

	Amp	ANUS
Editor score	8.2 / 10	6.5 / 10
Pricing model	Freemium	Open source
Starting price	$20/mo	Free
Reader upvotes	0	0
Best for	terminal, agent	terminal-agent, free-models, cli
Agent Skills support	Yes	No
Subagents support	Yes	No
MCP support	Yes	No
AGENTS.md support	Yes	No
Plugins support	Yes	No
Hooks support	No	No
Rules support	No	No
Agent skills in this directory	47	0
Subagents & agents in this directory	9	3
MCP servers in this directory	72	0

Our pick

Amp edges it with a score of 8.2 versus 6.5. Amp is the better fit if you value: strong results on hard, multi-step tasks, shared threads for team review. Choose ANUS instead if you need: costs nothing to run end to end by cycling across multiple providers' free tiers (openrouter, gemini, groq, cerebras, mistral) as rate limits hit, active project with mit license, transparent local key storage, and a model-ranking list that refreshes twice a day.