Try “Claude Code skills”, “MCP servers for Cursor” or “Codex” · Esc to close

Amp vs Claurst (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Amp and Claurst stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Amp

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

8.2 /10

Pricing: Free plan, paid from $20/mo

Pros

  • Strong results on hard, multi-step tasks
  • Shared threads for team review
  • Subagents and AGENTS.md built in

Cons

  • Usage-based costs add up on large tasks
  • Fewer configuration knobs by design
Visit Amp ↗

Claurst

Open-source Rust terminal coding agent with ACP support for Zed, Neovim, JetBrains

7.0 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Speaks the open Agent Client Protocol, so it plugs into Zed, Neovim, and JetBrains as a native agent
  • Multi-provider AI routing rather than lock-in to one vendor, plus a plugin system and chat forking
  • Fully open source (GPL-3.0) with no telemetry/tracking by the maintainer's own account; actively developed (commits within the last month)

Cons

  • Still officially Beta (v0.1.7); the README itself flags /share, Free Mode, /goal, and "ultracode" as experimental
  • Originated as a clean-room reimplementation of Claude Code's behavior rather than an original design, so parity with the original may lag
Visit Claurst ↗

Amp vs Claurst at a glance

AmpClaurst
Editor score8.2 / 107.0 / 10
Pricing modelFreemiumOpen source
Starting price$20/moFree
Reader upvotes00
Best forterminal, agentterminal, rust, acp
Agent Skills supportYesNo
Subagents supportYesNo
MCP supportYesNo
AGENTS.md supportYesNo
Plugins supportYesNo
Hooks supportNoNo
Rules supportNoNo
Agent skills in this directory470
Subagents & agents in this directory93
MCP servers in this directory720

Our pick

Amp edges it with a score of 8.2 versus 7.0. Amp is the better fit if you value: strong results on hard, multi-step tasks, shared threads for team review. Choose Claurst instead if you need: speaks the open agent client protocol, so it plugs into zed, neovim, and jetbrains as a native agent, multi-provider ai routing rather than lock-in to one vendor, plus a plugin system and chat forking.

Other terminal coding agents to consider

Full ranking →

OpenAI Codex Freemium

OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans

★ 128k · +1.2k this week

9.1 Visit ↗

OpenCode Open source

Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider

★ 211k · +1.4k this week

8.4 Visit ↗

Orca Open source

An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile

★ 84k · +5.3k this week

8.0 Visit ↗