Try “Claude Code skills”, “MCP servers for Cursor” or “Codex” · Esc to close

Amp vs Codeburn (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Amp and Codeburn stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Amp

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

8.2 /10

Pricing: Free plan, paid from $20/mo

Pros

  • Strong results on hard, multi-step tasks
  • Shared threads for team review
  • Subagents and AGENTS.md built in

Cons

  • Usage-based costs add up on large tasks
  • Fewer configuration knobs by design
Visit Amp ↗

Codeburn

Free local dashboard that tracks AI coding token spend across 40+ tools

6.5 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • 100% local — reads existing session files with no account, API keys, or uploads; optional desktop telemetry defaults off in the EU/EEA/UK
  • Covers roughly 40 tools/agents with genuinely useful features (waste detection with auto-fix, budget guards, spend-vs-commits correlation)
  • Free and open source (MIT) with an active community (11k+ GitHub stars, reportedly 150k+ users)

Cons

  • It's an observability/cost tool, not a coding agent — it doesn't write or edit code itself
  • Cost estimates rely on a 24-hour-cached pricing feed (LiteLLM), so very new or custom models can lag briefly
Visit Codeburn ↗

Amp vs Codeburn at a glance

AmpCodeburn
Editor score8.2 / 106.5 / 10
Pricing modelFreemiumOpen source
Starting price$20/moFree
Reader upvotes01
Best forterminal, agentcost-tracking, cli, analytics
Agent Skills supportYesNo
Subagents supportYesNo
MCP supportYesNo
AGENTS.md supportYesNo
Plugins supportYesNo
Hooks supportNoNo
Rules supportNoNo
Agent skills in this directory470
Subagents & agents in this directory93
MCP servers in this directory720

Our pick

Amp edges it with a score of 8.2 versus 6.5. Amp is the better fit if you value: strong results on hard, multi-step tasks, shared threads for team review. Choose Codeburn instead if you need: 100% local — reads existing session files with no account, api keys, or uploads; optional desktop telemetry defaults off in the eu/eea/uk, covers roughly 40 tools/agents with genuinely useful features (waste detection with auto-fix, budget guards, spend-vs-commits correlation).

Other terminal coding agents to consider

Full ranking →

OpenAI Codex Freemium

OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans

★ 128k · +1.2k this week

9.1 Visit ↗

OpenCode Open source

Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider

★ 211k · +1.4k this week

8.4 Visit ↗

Orca Open source

An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile

★ 84k · +5.3k this week

8.0 Visit ↗