Amp vs Hunk (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?
Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Amp and Hunk stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.
Amp
Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph
8.2 /10
Pricing: Free plan, paid from $20/mo
Pros
- Strong results on hard, multi-step tasks
- Shared threads for team review
- Subagents and AGENTS.md built in
Cons
- Usage-based costs add up on large tasks
- Fewer configuration knobs by design
Hunk
Terminal diff viewer built for reviewing multi-file changes made by AI coding agents
7.0 /10
Pricing: Open source
Pros
- Purpose-built review UI for agent-generated diffs: multi-file review stream, inline agent annotations, split/unified/auto layouts, watch mode
- Works as a Git pager/difftool and auto-detects Jujutsu and Sapling too, not just Git
- Actively maintained (MIT, 9.3k stars, 305 forks, 876 commits) with an extension system and community Discord
Cons
- Doesn't map cleanly onto any single existing app category here — it's a review/viewer tool for agent output, not an agent, editor, app-builder, or cloud agent i
- No dated "last commit" was visible in the fetched page, so exact recent-activity cadence couldn't be confirmed beyond the commit count
Amp vs Hunk at a glance
| Amp | Hunk | |
|---|---|---|
| Editor score | 8.2 / 10 | 7.0 / 10 |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Open source |
| Starting price | $20/mo | Free |
| Reader upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Best for | terminal, agent | diff-viewer, code-review, terminal-ui |
| Agent Skills support | Yes | No |
| Subagents support | Yes | No |
| MCP support | Yes | No |
| AGENTS.md support | Yes | No |
| Plugins support | Yes | No |
| Hooks support | No | No |
| Rules support | No | No |
| Agent skills in this directory | 47 | 0 |
| Subagents & agents in this directory | 9 | 3 |
| MCP servers in this directory | 72 | 0 |
Our pick
Amp edges it with a score of 8.2 versus 7.0. Amp is the better fit if you value: strong results on hard, multi-step tasks, shared threads for team review. Choose Hunk instead if you need: purpose-built review ui for agent-generated diffs: multi-file review stream, inline agent annotations, split/unified/auto layouts, watch mode, works as a git pager/difftool and auto-detects jujutsu and sapling too, not just git.
Other terminal coding agents to consider
Full ranking →Claude Code Paid
Anthropic's agentic coding tool for the terminal, IDE, desktop and web
🔥 Claude Pro billed annually: $17/month instead of $20OpenAI Codex Freemium
OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans
OpenCode Open source
Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider
Orca Open source
An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile