Try “Claude Code skills”, “MCP servers for Cursor” or “Codex” · Esc to close

Claurst vs OpenCode (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Claurst and OpenCode stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Claurst

Open-source Rust terminal coding agent with ACP support for Zed, Neovim, JetBrains

7.0 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Speaks the open Agent Client Protocol, so it plugs into Zed, Neovim, and JetBrains as a native agent
  • Multi-provider AI routing rather than lock-in to one vendor, plus a plugin system and chat forking
  • Fully open source (GPL-3.0) with no telemetry/tracking by the maintainer's own account; actively developed (commits within the last month)

Cons

  • Still officially Beta (v0.1.7); the README itself flags /share, Free Mode, /goal, and "ultracode" as experimental
  • Originated as a clean-room reimplementation of Claude Code's behavior rather than an original design, so parity with the original may lag
Visit Claurst ↗

OpenCode

Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider

8.4 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Free and open source; any model provider
  • Claude Code-style extensibility
  • Fast, well-designed terminal UI

Cons

  • You pay the model provider directly; costs vary with usage
  • Smaller community of ready-made extensions
Visit OpenCode ↗

Claurst vs OpenCode at a glance

ClaurstOpenCode
Editor score7.0 / 108.4 / 10
Pricing modelOpen sourceOpen source
Starting priceFreeFree
Reader upvotes01
Best forterminal, rust, acpterminal, open source, byok
Agent Skills supportNoYes
Subagents supportNoYes
MCP supportNoYes
AGENTS.md supportNoYes
Plugins supportNoYes
Hooks supportNoNo
Rules supportNoNo
Agent skills in this directory053
Subagents & agents in this directory326
MCP servers in this directory073

Our pick

OpenCode edges it with a score of 8.4 versus 7.0. OpenCode is the better fit if you value: free and open source; any model provider, claude code-style extensibility. Choose Claurst instead if you need: speaks the open agent client protocol, so it plugs into zed, neovim, and jetbrains as a native agent, multi-provider ai routing rather than lock-in to one vendor, plus a plugin system and chat forking.

Other terminal coding agents to consider

Full ranking →

OpenAI Codex Freemium

OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans

★ 128k · +1.2k this week

9.1 Visit ↗

Amp Freemium

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

Free plan, paid from $20/mo

8.2 Visit ↗

Orca Open source

An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile

★ 84k · +5.3k this week

8.0 Visit ↗