Try “Claude Code skills”, “MCP servers for Cursor” or “Codex” · Esc to close

Claurst vs Orca (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Claurst and Orca stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Claurst

Open-source Rust terminal coding agent with ACP support for Zed, Neovim, JetBrains

7.0 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Speaks the open Agent Client Protocol, so it plugs into Zed, Neovim, and JetBrains as a native agent
  • Multi-provider AI routing rather than lock-in to one vendor, plus a plugin system and chat forking
  • Fully open source (GPL-3.0) with no telemetry/tracking by the maintainer's own account; actively developed (commits within the last month)

Cons

  • Still officially Beta (v0.1.7); the README itself flags /share, Free Mode, /goal, and "ultracode" as experimental
  • Originated as a clean-room reimplementation of Claude Code's behavior rather than an original design, so parity with the original may lag
Visit Claurst ↗

Orca

An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile

8.0 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Runs multiple coding agents in parallel isolated worktrees with diff comparison
  • Free, open source (MIT), backed by Y Combinator
  • Mobile companion apps for monitoring/steering agents remotely

Cons

  • No hosted/managed tier documented — you bring your own agent subscriptions
  • Extremely fast recent star growth is worth watching, even though the activity looks organic
Visit Orca ↗

Claurst vs Orca at a glance

ClaurstOrca
Editor score7.0 / 108.0 / 10
Pricing modelOpen sourceOpen source
Starting priceFreeFree
Reader upvotes00
Best forterminal, rust, acpade, parallel-agents, claude-code
Agent Skills supportNoNo
Subagents supportNoNo
MCP supportNoNo
AGENTS.md supportNoNo
Plugins supportNoNo
Hooks supportNoNo
Rules supportNoNo
Agent skills in this directory00
Subagents & agents in this directory33
MCP servers in this directory00

Our pick

Orca edges it with a score of 8.0 versus 7.0. Orca is the better fit if you value: runs multiple coding agents in parallel isolated worktrees with diff comparison, free, open source (mit), backed by y combinator. Choose Claurst instead if you need: speaks the open agent client protocol, so it plugs into zed, neovim, and jetbrains as a native agent, multi-provider ai routing rather than lock-in to one vendor, plus a plugin system and chat forking.

Other terminal coding agents to consider

Full ranking →

OpenAI Codex Freemium

OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans

★ 128k · +1.2k this week

9.1 Visit ↗

OpenCode Open source

Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider

★ 211k · +1.4k this week

8.4 Visit ↗

Amp Freemium

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

Free plan, paid from $20/mo

8.2 Visit ↗