Try “Claude Code skills”, “MCP servers for Cursor” or “Codex” · Esc to close

Codeburn vs OpenCode (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Codeburn and OpenCode stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Codeburn

Free local dashboard that tracks AI coding token spend across 40+ tools

6.5 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • 100% local — reads existing session files with no account, API keys, or uploads; optional desktop telemetry defaults off in the EU/EEA/UK
  • Covers roughly 40 tools/agents with genuinely useful features (waste detection with auto-fix, budget guards, spend-vs-commits correlation)
  • Free and open source (MIT) with an active community (11k+ GitHub stars, reportedly 150k+ users)

Cons

  • It's an observability/cost tool, not a coding agent — it doesn't write or edit code itself
  • Cost estimates rely on a 24-hour-cached pricing feed (LiteLLM), so very new or custom models can lag briefly
Visit Codeburn ↗

OpenCode

Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider

8.4 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Free and open source; any model provider
  • Claude Code-style extensibility
  • Fast, well-designed terminal UI

Cons

  • You pay the model provider directly; costs vary with usage
  • Smaller community of ready-made extensions
Visit OpenCode ↗

Codeburn vs OpenCode at a glance

CodeburnOpenCode
Editor score6.5 / 108.4 / 10
Pricing modelOpen sourceOpen source
Starting priceFreeFree
Reader upvotes11
Best forcost-tracking, cli, analyticsterminal, open source, byok
Agent Skills supportNoYes
Subagents supportNoYes
MCP supportNoYes
AGENTS.md supportNoYes
Plugins supportNoYes
Hooks supportNoNo
Rules supportNoNo
Agent skills in this directory053
Subagents & agents in this directory326
MCP servers in this directory073

Our pick

OpenCode edges it with a score of 8.4 versus 6.5. OpenCode is the better fit if you value: free and open source; any model provider, claude code-style extensibility. Choose Codeburn instead if you need: 100% local — reads existing session files with no account, api keys, or uploads; optional desktop telemetry defaults off in the eu/eea/uk, covers roughly 40 tools/agents with genuinely useful features (waste detection with auto-fix, budget guards, spend-vs-commits correlation).

Other terminal coding agents to consider

Full ranking →

OpenAI Codex Freemium

OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans

★ 128k · +1.2k this week

9.1 Visit ↗

Amp Freemium

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

Free plan, paid from $20/mo

8.2 Visit ↗

Orca Open source

An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile

★ 84k · +5.3k this week

8.0 Visit ↗