Try “Claude Code skills”, “MCP servers for Cursor” or “Codex” · Esc to close

Codeburn vs Orca (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Codeburn and Orca stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Codeburn

Free local dashboard that tracks AI coding token spend across 40+ tools

6.5 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • 100% local — reads existing session files with no account, API keys, or uploads; optional desktop telemetry defaults off in the EU/EEA/UK
  • Covers roughly 40 tools/agents with genuinely useful features (waste detection with auto-fix, budget guards, spend-vs-commits correlation)
  • Free and open source (MIT) with an active community (11k+ GitHub stars, reportedly 150k+ users)

Cons

  • It's an observability/cost tool, not a coding agent — it doesn't write or edit code itself
  • Cost estimates rely on a 24-hour-cached pricing feed (LiteLLM), so very new or custom models can lag briefly
Visit Codeburn ↗

Orca

An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile

8.0 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Runs multiple coding agents in parallel isolated worktrees with diff comparison
  • Free, open source (MIT), backed by Y Combinator
  • Mobile companion apps for monitoring/steering agents remotely

Cons

  • No hosted/managed tier documented — you bring your own agent subscriptions
  • Extremely fast recent star growth is worth watching, even though the activity looks organic
Visit Orca ↗

Codeburn vs Orca at a glance

CodeburnOrca
Editor score6.5 / 108.0 / 10
Pricing modelOpen sourceOpen source
Starting priceFreeFree
Reader upvotes10
Best forcost-tracking, cli, analyticsade, parallel-agents, claude-code
Agent Skills supportNoNo
Subagents supportNoNo
MCP supportNoNo
AGENTS.md supportNoNo
Plugins supportNoNo
Hooks supportNoNo
Rules supportNoNo
Agent skills in this directory00
Subagents & agents in this directory33
MCP servers in this directory00

Our pick

Orca edges it with a score of 8.0 versus 6.5. Orca is the better fit if you value: runs multiple coding agents in parallel isolated worktrees with diff comparison, free, open source (mit), backed by y combinator. Choose Codeburn instead if you need: 100% local — reads existing session files with no account, api keys, or uploads; optional desktop telemetry defaults off in the eu/eea/uk, covers roughly 40 tools/agents with genuinely useful features (waste detection with auto-fix, budget guards, spend-vs-commits correlation).

Other terminal coding agents to consider

Full ranking →

OpenAI Codex Freemium

OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans

★ 128k · +1.2k this week

9.1 Visit ↗

OpenCode Open source

Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider

★ 211k · +1.4k this week

8.4 Visit ↗

Amp Freemium

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

Free plan, paid from $20/mo

8.2 Visit ↗