Codeburn vs Orca (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?
Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Codeburn and Orca stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.
Codeburn
Free local dashboard that tracks AI coding token spend across 40+ tools
6.5 /10
Pricing: Open source
Pros
- 100% local — reads existing session files with no account, API keys, or uploads; optional desktop telemetry defaults off in the EU/EEA/UK
- Covers roughly 40 tools/agents with genuinely useful features (waste detection with auto-fix, budget guards, spend-vs-commits correlation)
- Free and open source (MIT) with an active community (11k+ GitHub stars, reportedly 150k+ users)
Cons
- It's an observability/cost tool, not a coding agent — it doesn't write or edit code itself
- Cost estimates rely on a 24-hour-cached pricing feed (LiteLLM), so very new or custom models can lag briefly
Orca
An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile
8.0 /10
Pricing: Open source
Pros
- Runs multiple coding agents in parallel isolated worktrees with diff comparison
- Free, open source (MIT), backed by Y Combinator
- Mobile companion apps for monitoring/steering agents remotely
Cons
- No hosted/managed tier documented — you bring your own agent subscriptions
- Extremely fast recent star growth is worth watching, even though the activity looks organic
Codeburn vs Orca at a glance
| Codeburn | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Editor score | 6.5 / 10 | 8.0 / 10 |
| Pricing model | Open source | Open source |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Reader upvotes | 1 | 0 |
| Best for | cost-tracking, cli, analytics | ade, parallel-agents, claude-code |
| Agent Skills support | No | No |
| Subagents support | No | No |
| MCP support | No | No |
| AGENTS.md support | No | No |
| Plugins support | No | No |
| Hooks support | No | No |
| Rules support | No | No |
| Agent skills in this directory | 0 | 0 |
| Subagents & agents in this directory | 3 | 3 |
| MCP servers in this directory | 0 | 0 |
Our pick
Orca edges it with a score of 8.0 versus 6.5. Orca is the better fit if you value: runs multiple coding agents in parallel isolated worktrees with diff comparison, free, open source (mit), backed by y combinator. Choose Codeburn instead if you need: 100% local — reads existing session files with no account, api keys, or uploads; optional desktop telemetry defaults off in the eu/eea/uk, covers roughly 40 tools/agents with genuinely useful features (waste detection with auto-fix, budget guards, spend-vs-commits correlation).
Other terminal coding agents to consider
Full ranking →Claude Code Paid
Anthropic's agentic coding tool for the terminal, IDE, desktop and web
🔥 Claude Pro billed annually: $17/month instead of $20OpenAI Codex Freemium
OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans
OpenCode Open source
Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider
Amp Freemium
Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph