Try “Claude Code skills”, “MCP servers for Cursor” or “Codex” · Esc to close

FuXi vs Orca (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how FuXi and Orca stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

FuXi

Provider-agnostic terminal coding agent positioned as a bring-your-own-model Claude Code alternative

7.0 /10

Pricing: Freemium

Pros

  • Feature-rich single static binary: 50+ tools, LSP diagnostics, Jupyter, browser automation, MCP client, durable sessions with checkpoints
  • Unusually transparent evaluation practice — publishes a reproducible, self-run benchmark against Claude Code with explicit caveats instead of a marketing score

Cons

  • Source code is proprietary despite living on GitHub — the repo hosts only docs, installers and the issue tracker, not the implementation
  • Installs via curl-pipe-to-shell, and ships a flag that bypasses all permission checks — treat it the way you would any command with root-level reach
Visit FuXi ↗

Orca

An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile

8.0 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Runs multiple coding agents in parallel isolated worktrees with diff comparison
  • Free, open source (MIT), backed by Y Combinator
  • Mobile companion apps for monitoring/steering agents remotely

Cons

  • No hosted/managed tier documented — you bring your own agent subscriptions
  • Extremely fast recent star growth is worth watching, even though the activity looks organic
Visit Orca ↗

FuXi vs Orca at a glance

FuXiOrca
Editor score7.0 / 108.0 / 10
Pricing modelFreemiumOpen source
Starting priceFreeFree
Reader upvotes00
Best forterminal-agent, provider-agnostic, mcp-clientade, parallel-agents, claude-code
Agent Skills supportNoNo
Subagents supportNoNo
MCP supportNoNo
AGENTS.md supportNoNo
Plugins supportNoNo
Hooks supportNoNo
Rules supportNoNo
Agent skills in this directory00
Subagents & agents in this directory33
MCP servers in this directory00

Our pick

Orca edges it with a score of 8.0 versus 7.0. Orca is the better fit if you value: runs multiple coding agents in parallel isolated worktrees with diff comparison, free, open source (mit), backed by y combinator. Choose FuXi instead if you need: feature-rich single static binary: 50+ tools, lsp diagnostics, jupyter, browser automation, mcp client, durable sessions with checkpoints, unusually transparent evaluation practice — publishes a reproducible, self-run benchmark against claude code with explicit caveats instead of a marketing score.

Other terminal coding agents to consider

Full ranking →

OpenAI Codex Freemium

OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans

★ 128k · +1.2k this week

9.1 Visit ↗

OpenCode Open source

Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider

★ 211k · +1.4k this week

8.4 Visit ↗

Amp Freemium

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

Free plan, paid from $20/mo

8.2 Visit ↗