FuXi vs Orca (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?
Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how FuXi and Orca stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.
FuXi
Provider-agnostic terminal coding agent positioned as a bring-your-own-model Claude Code alternative
7.0 /10
Pricing: Freemium
Pros
- Feature-rich single static binary: 50+ tools, LSP diagnostics, Jupyter, browser automation, MCP client, durable sessions with checkpoints
- Unusually transparent evaluation practice — publishes a reproducible, self-run benchmark against Claude Code with explicit caveats instead of a marketing score
Cons
- Source code is proprietary despite living on GitHub — the repo hosts only docs, installers and the issue tracker, not the implementation
- Installs via curl-pipe-to-shell, and ships a flag that bypasses all permission checks — treat it the way you would any command with root-level reach
Orca
An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile
8.0 /10
Pricing: Open source
Pros
- Runs multiple coding agents in parallel isolated worktrees with diff comparison
- Free, open source (MIT), backed by Y Combinator
- Mobile companion apps for monitoring/steering agents remotely
Cons
- No hosted/managed tier documented — you bring your own agent subscriptions
- Extremely fast recent star growth is worth watching, even though the activity looks organic
FuXi vs Orca at a glance
| FuXi | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Editor score | 7.0 / 10 | 8.0 / 10 |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Open source |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Reader upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Best for | terminal-agent, provider-agnostic, mcp-client | ade, parallel-agents, claude-code |
| Agent Skills support | No | No |
| Subagents support | No | No |
| MCP support | No | No |
| AGENTS.md support | No | No |
| Plugins support | No | No |
| Hooks support | No | No |
| Rules support | No | No |
| Agent skills in this directory | 0 | 0 |
| Subagents & agents in this directory | 3 | 3 |
| MCP servers in this directory | 0 | 0 |
Our pick
Orca edges it with a score of 8.0 versus 7.0. Orca is the better fit if you value: runs multiple coding agents in parallel isolated worktrees with diff comparison, free, open source (mit), backed by y combinator. Choose FuXi instead if you need: feature-rich single static binary: 50+ tools, lsp diagnostics, jupyter, browser automation, mcp client, durable sessions with checkpoints, unusually transparent evaluation practice — publishes a reproducible, self-run benchmark against claude code with explicit caveats instead of a marketing score.
Other terminal coding agents to consider
Full ranking →Claude Code Paid
Anthropic's agentic coding tool for the terminal, IDE, desktop and web
🔥 Claude Pro billed annually: $17/month instead of $20OpenAI Codex Freemium
OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans
OpenCode Open source
Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider
Amp Freemium
Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph