Try “Claude Code skills”, “MCP servers for Cursor” or “Codex” · Esc to close

Gptme vs OpenCode (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Gptme and OpenCode stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Gptme

Provider-agnostic terminal AI agent with shell, Python, file and browser tools

7.5 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Model-agnostic (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI, DeepSeek, OpenRouter, local llama.cpp) rather than locked to one vendor
  • Mature and actively maintained: MIT, ~4.4k stars, 4,500+ commits, recent v0.33.0 release (Aug 2026) adding sandboxed execution
  • Broad tool set out of the box: shell, Python REPL, incremental file patching, browser automation, vision, plus a plugin/skills/hooks system

Cons

  • Executes arbitrary shell and Python commands on your machine at the model's direction — real risk if run unsupervised without its guardrail features enabled
  • Autonomous/persistent-agent mode needs careful configuration (task selectors, pre-commit checks) to use safely
Visit Gptme ↗

OpenCode

Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider

8.4 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Free and open source; any model provider
  • Claude Code-style extensibility
  • Fast, well-designed terminal UI

Cons

  • You pay the model provider directly; costs vary with usage
  • Smaller community of ready-made extensions
Visit OpenCode ↗

Gptme vs OpenCode at a glance

GptmeOpenCode
Editor score7.5 / 108.4 / 10
Pricing modelOpen sourceOpen source
Starting priceFreeFree
Reader upvotes01
Best forterminal-agent, cli, pythonterminal, open source, byok
Agent Skills supportNoYes
Subagents supportNoYes
MCP supportNoYes
AGENTS.md supportNoYes
Plugins supportNoYes
Hooks supportNoNo
Rules supportNoNo
Agent skills in this directory053
Subagents & agents in this directory326
MCP servers in this directory073

Our pick

OpenCode edges it with a score of 8.4 versus 7.5. OpenCode is the better fit if you value: free and open source; any model provider, claude code-style extensibility. Choose Gptme instead if you need: model-agnostic (anthropic, openai, google, xai, deepseek, openrouter, local llama.cpp) rather than locked to one vendor, mature and actively maintained: mit, ~4.4k stars, 4,500+ commits, recent v0.33.0 release (aug 2026) adding sandboxed execution.

Other terminal coding agents to consider

Full ranking →

OpenAI Codex Freemium

OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans

★ 128k · +1.2k this week

9.1 Visit ↗

Amp Freemium

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

Free plan, paid from $20/mo

8.2 Visit ↗

Orca Open source

An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile

★ 84k · +5.3k this week

8.0 Visit ↗