Try “Claude Code skills”, “MCP servers for Cursor” or “Codex” · Esc to close

Gptme vs Orca (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Gptme and Orca stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Gptme

Provider-agnostic terminal AI agent with shell, Python, file and browser tools

7.5 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Model-agnostic (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI, DeepSeek, OpenRouter, local llama.cpp) rather than locked to one vendor
  • Mature and actively maintained: MIT, ~4.4k stars, 4,500+ commits, recent v0.33.0 release (Aug 2026) adding sandboxed execution
  • Broad tool set out of the box: shell, Python REPL, incremental file patching, browser automation, vision, plus a plugin/skills/hooks system

Cons

  • Executes arbitrary shell and Python commands on your machine at the model's direction — real risk if run unsupervised without its guardrail features enabled
  • Autonomous/persistent-agent mode needs careful configuration (task selectors, pre-commit checks) to use safely
Visit Gptme ↗

Orca

An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile

8.0 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Runs multiple coding agents in parallel isolated worktrees with diff comparison
  • Free, open source (MIT), backed by Y Combinator
  • Mobile companion apps for monitoring/steering agents remotely

Cons

  • No hosted/managed tier documented — you bring your own agent subscriptions
  • Extremely fast recent star growth is worth watching, even though the activity looks organic
Visit Orca ↗

Gptme vs Orca at a glance

GptmeOrca
Editor score7.5 / 108.0 / 10
Pricing modelOpen sourceOpen source
Starting priceFreeFree
Reader upvotes00
Best forterminal-agent, cli, pythonade, parallel-agents, claude-code
Agent Skills supportNoNo
Subagents supportNoNo
MCP supportNoNo
AGENTS.md supportNoNo
Plugins supportNoNo
Hooks supportNoNo
Rules supportNoNo
Agent skills in this directory00
Subagents & agents in this directory33
MCP servers in this directory00

Our pick

Orca edges it with a score of 8.0 versus 7.5. Orca is the better fit if you value: runs multiple coding agents in parallel isolated worktrees with diff comparison, free, open source (mit), backed by y combinator. Choose Gptme instead if you need: model-agnostic (anthropic, openai, google, xai, deepseek, openrouter, local llama.cpp) rather than locked to one vendor, mature and actively maintained: mit, ~4.4k stars, 4,500+ commits, recent v0.33.0 release (aug 2026) adding sandboxed execution.

Other terminal coding agents to consider

Full ranking →

OpenAI Codex Freemium

OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans

★ 128k · +1.2k this week

9.1 Visit ↗

OpenCode Open source

Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider

★ 211k · +1.4k this week

8.4 Visit ↗

Amp Freemium

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

Free plan, paid from $20/mo

8.2 Visit ↗