Try “Claude Code skills”, “MCP servers for Cursor” or “Codex” · Esc to close

Grok CLI vs OpenCode (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Grok CLI and OpenCode stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Grok CLI

Open-source terminal coding agent for xAI's Grok API with search, media generation and remote control

7.0 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Fully open source (MIT) with a broad, well-documented feature set: sub-agents, MCP, lifecycle hooks, a microVM sandbox, and headless/CI-friendly modes
  • Backed by a real org (superagent-ai) with CI, changelog and clear troubleshooting docs

Cons

  • Main branch's tip commit is from May 2026, several months before this review, suggesting a slower recent cadence
  • Desktop automation and Telegram remote control widen the attack surface; sandboxing is Apple-Silicon-only, so Linux/Intel Mac runs are unsandboxed
Visit Grok CLI ↗

OpenCode

Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider

8.4 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

  • Free and open source; any model provider
  • Claude Code-style extensibility
  • Fast, well-designed terminal UI

Cons

  • You pay the model provider directly; costs vary with usage
  • Smaller community of ready-made extensions
Visit OpenCode ↗

Grok CLI vs OpenCode at a glance

Grok CLIOpenCode
Editor score7.0 / 108.4 / 10
Pricing modelOpen sourceOpen source
Starting priceFreeFree
Reader upvotes01
Best forgrok, xai, terminal-agentterminal, open source, byok
Agent Skills supportNoYes
Subagents supportNoYes
MCP supportNoYes
AGENTS.md supportNoYes
Plugins supportNoYes
Hooks supportNoNo
Rules supportNoNo
Agent skills in this directory053
Subagents & agents in this directory426
MCP servers in this directory073

Our pick

OpenCode edges it with a score of 8.4 versus 7.0. OpenCode is the better fit if you value: free and open source; any model provider, claude code-style extensibility. Choose Grok CLI instead if you need: fully open source (mit) with a broad, well-documented feature set: sub-agents, mcp, lifecycle hooks, a microvm sandbox, and headless/ci-friendly modes, backed by a real org (superagent-ai) with ci, changelog and clear troubleshooting docs.

Other terminal coding agents to consider

Full ranking →

OpenAI Codex Freemium

OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans

★ 128k · +1.2k this week

9.1 Visit ↗

Amp Freemium

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

Free plan, paid from $20/mo

8.2 Visit ↗

Orca Open source

An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile

★ 84k · +5.3k this week

8.0 Visit ↗