Kaku vs OpenCode (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Kaku and OpenCode stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Kaku

Zero-config macOS terminal built on WezTerm for running AI coding CLIs

7.5 /10

Pricing: Free

Pros

Popular and active: ~6k GitHub stars, 1,660+ commits, MIT licensed
Ships with sensible zero-config defaults, fonts, themes and shell integration tuned for running AI coding CLIs
Built-in glue for a real workflow: pane/tab management plus Lazygit and Yazi integration alongside AI chat/command-suggestion shortcuts

Cons

macOS only
It's a terminal host, not an agent itself — you still bring your own AI CLI (Claude Code, Gemini, Copilot, Kimi Code) and API keys

Visit Kaku ↗

OpenCode

Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider

8.4 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

Free and open source; any model provider
Claude Code-style extensibility
Fast, well-designed terminal UI

Cons

You pay the model provider directly; costs vary with usage
Smaller community of ready-made extensions

Visit OpenCode ↗

Kaku vs OpenCode at a glance

	Kaku	OpenCode
Editor score	7.5 / 10	8.4 / 10
Pricing model	Free	Open source
Starting price	Free	Free
Reader upvotes	0	1
Best for	terminal, macos, wezterm	terminal, open source, byok
Agent Skills support	No	Yes
Subagents support	No	Yes
MCP support	No	Yes
AGENTS.md support	No	Yes
Plugins support	No	Yes
Hooks support	No	No
Rules support	No	No
Agent skills in this directory	0	53
Subagents & agents in this directory	3	26
MCP servers in this directory	0	73

Our pick

OpenCode edges it with a score of 8.4 versus 7.5. OpenCode is the better fit if you value: free and open source; any model provider, claude code-style extensibility. Choose Kaku instead if you need: popular and active: ~6k github stars, 1,660+ commits, mit licensed, ships with sensible zero-config defaults, fonts, themes and shell integration tuned for running ai coding clis.