Amp vs Cmux (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?
Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Amp and Cmux stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.
Amp
Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph
8.2 /10
Pricing: Free plan, paid from $20/mo
Pros
- Strong results on hard, multi-step tasks
- Shared threads for team review
- Subagents and AGENTS.md built in
Cons
- Usage-based costs add up on large tasks
- Fewer configuration knobs by design
Cmux
Ghostty-based macOS terminal built for running many AI coding agents at once
7.0 /10
Pricing: Freemium
Pros
- Purpose-built notification and status system (rings, tab highlights, a dedicated panel) so you can tell at a glance which of many agent panes needs attention
- Sidebar surfaces git branch, PR status, working directory, and listening ports per pane; session layout, scrollback, and browser history survive a relaunch
- Free and open source (GPL-3.0-or-later) with native resume integrations for a long list of CLI agents beyond Claude Code
Cons
- macOS only, and still early with heavy churn (2k open issues, 1.7k open PRs) relative to its 27k stars
- Founder's Edition (paid) gates the iOS app, cloud VMs and early AI features behind a tier with no public pricing listed
Amp vs Cmux at a glance
| Amp | Cmux | |
|---|---|---|
| Editor score | 8.2 / 10 | 7.0 / 10 |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | $20/mo | Free |
| Reader upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Best for | terminal, agent | terminal, claude-code, codex |
| Agent Skills support | Yes | No |
| Subagents support | Yes | No |
| MCP support | Yes | No |
| AGENTS.md support | Yes | No |
| Plugins support | Yes | No |
| Hooks support | No | No |
| Rules support | No | No |
| Agent skills in this directory | 47 | 0 |
| Subagents & agents in this directory | 9 | 3 |
| MCP servers in this directory | 72 | 0 |
Our pick
Amp edges it with a score of 8.2 versus 7.0. Amp is the better fit if you value: strong results on hard, multi-step tasks, shared threads for team review. Choose Cmux instead if you need: purpose-built notification and status system (rings, tab highlights, a dedicated panel) so you can tell at a glance which of many agent panes needs attention, sidebar surfaces git branch, pr status, working directory, and listening ports per pane; session layout, scrollback, and browser history survive a relaunch.
Other terminal coding agents to consider
Full ranking →Claude Code Paid
Anthropic's agentic coding tool for the terminal, IDE, desktop and web
🔥 Claude Pro billed annually: $17/month instead of $20OpenAI Codex Freemium
OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans
OpenCode Open source
Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider
Orca Open source
An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile