Try “Claude Code skills”, “MCP servers for Cursor” or “Codex” · Esc to close

Amp vs Cmux (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Amp and Cmux stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Amp

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

8.2 /10

Pricing: Free plan, paid from $20/mo

Pros

  • Strong results on hard, multi-step tasks
  • Shared threads for team review
  • Subagents and AGENTS.md built in

Cons

  • Usage-based costs add up on large tasks
  • Fewer configuration knobs by design
Visit Amp ↗

Cmux

Ghostty-based macOS terminal built for running many AI coding agents at once

7.0 /10

Pricing: Freemium

Pros

  • Purpose-built notification and status system (rings, tab highlights, a dedicated panel) so you can tell at a glance which of many agent panes needs attention
  • Sidebar surfaces git branch, PR status, working directory, and listening ports per pane; session layout, scrollback, and browser history survive a relaunch
  • Free and open source (GPL-3.0-or-later) with native resume integrations for a long list of CLI agents beyond Claude Code

Cons

  • macOS only, and still early with heavy churn (2k open issues, 1.7k open PRs) relative to its 27k stars
  • Founder's Edition (paid) gates the iOS app, cloud VMs and early AI features behind a tier with no public pricing listed
Visit Cmux ↗

Amp vs Cmux at a glance

AmpCmux
Editor score8.2 / 107.0 / 10
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$20/moFree
Reader upvotes00
Best forterminal, agentterminal, claude-code, codex
Agent Skills supportYesNo
Subagents supportYesNo
MCP supportYesNo
AGENTS.md supportYesNo
Plugins supportYesNo
Hooks supportNoNo
Rules supportNoNo
Agent skills in this directory470
Subagents & agents in this directory93
MCP servers in this directory720

Our pick

Amp edges it with a score of 8.2 versus 7.0. Amp is the better fit if you value: strong results on hard, multi-step tasks, shared threads for team review. Choose Cmux instead if you need: purpose-built notification and status system (rings, tab highlights, a dedicated panel) so you can tell at a glance which of many agent panes needs attention, sidebar surfaces git branch, pr status, working directory, and listening ports per pane; session layout, scrollback, and browser history survive a relaunch.

Other terminal coding agents to consider

Full ranking →

OpenAI Codex Freemium

OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans

★ 128k · +1.2k this week

9.1 Visit ↗

OpenCode Open source

Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider

★ 211k · +1.4k this week

8.4 Visit ↗

Orca Open source

An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile

★ 84k · +5.3k this week

8.0 Visit ↗