Amp vs Kun (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Amp and Kun stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Amp

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

8.2 /10

Pricing: Free plan, paid from $20/mo

Pros

Strong results on hard, multi-step tasks
Shared threads for team review
Subagents and AGENTS.md built in

Cons

Usage-based costs add up on large tasks
Fewer configuration knobs by design

Visit Amp ↗

Kun

Local-first AI agent workspace for code, design, and documents, in GUI or TUI

7.0 /10

Pricing: Freemium

Pros

Single runtime spans desktop GUI and terminal TUI with shared state
Broad scope beyond coding: design canvas and document/office modes too
Multi-model support (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Ollama, DeepSeek) avoids vendor lock-in

Cons

PolyForm Noncommercial license blocks commercial use without a separate agreement
Breadth across code/design/work modes may mean less depth than a coding-only specialist tool

Visit Kun ↗

Amp vs Kun at a glance

	Amp	Kun
Editor score	8.2 / 10	7.0 / 10
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Starting price	$20/mo	Free
Reader upvotes	0	0
Best for	terminal, agent	local-first, agent-workspace, tui
Agent Skills support	Yes	No
Subagents support	Yes	No
MCP support	Yes	Yes
AGENTS.md support	Yes	No
Plugins support	Yes	No
Hooks support	No	No
Rules support	No	No
Agent skills in this directory	47	0
Subagents & agents in this directory	9	3
MCP servers in this directory	72	72

Our pick

Amp edges it with a score of 8.2 versus 7.0. Amp is the better fit if you value: strong results on hard, multi-step tasks, shared threads for team review. Choose Kun instead if you need: single runtime spans desktop gui and terminal tui with shared state, broad scope beyond coding: design canvas and document/office modes too.