Amp vs MiMo Code (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?
Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Amp and MiMo Code stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.
Amp
Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph
8.2 /10
Pricing: Free plan, paid from $20/mo
Pros
- Strong results on hard, multi-step tasks
- Shared threads for team review
- Subagents and AGENTS.md built in
Cons
- Usage-based costs add up on large tasks
- Fewer configuration knobs by design
MiMo Code
Terminal AI coding agent with persistent memory and multi-agent modes
6.5 /10
Pricing: Open source
Pros
- Persistent, SQLite-backed project memory and automatic checkpoints keep long sessions coherent across restarts
- Provider-agnostic — works with Xiaomi's own MiMo models, OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, xAI Grok, or any custom OpenAI-compatible endpoint
- Ships 20+ built-in skills (PDF/Word/PowerPoint/Excel handling, arXiv analysis, research writing) well beyond plain code editing
Cons
- macOS support is limited to iTerm2 or the VS Code terminal — Terminal.app isn't supported
- An unrestricted permission flag exists that auto-approves every agent action if misused; the docs explicitly warn against it outside disposable environments
Amp vs MiMo Code at a glance
| Amp | MiMo Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Editor score | 8.2 / 10 | 6.5 / 10 |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Open source |
| Starting price | $20/mo | Free |
| Reader upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Best for | terminal, agent | terminal, cli, multi-agent |
| Agent Skills support | Yes | No |
| Subagents support | Yes | No |
| MCP support | Yes | No |
| AGENTS.md support | Yes | No |
| Plugins support | Yes | No |
| Hooks support | No | No |
| Rules support | No | No |
| Agent skills in this directory | 47 | 0 |
| Subagents & agents in this directory | 9 | 3 |
| MCP servers in this directory | 72 | 0 |
Our pick
Amp edges it with a score of 8.2 versus 6.5. Amp is the better fit if you value: strong results on hard, multi-step tasks, shared threads for team review. Choose MiMo Code instead if you need: persistent, sqlite-backed project memory and automatic checkpoints keep long sessions coherent across restarts, provider-agnostic — works with xiaomi's own mimo models, openai, anthropic claude, xai grok, or any custom openai-compatible endpoint.
Other terminal coding agents to consider
Full ranking →Claude Code Paid
Anthropic's agentic coding tool for the terminal, IDE, desktop and web
🔥 Claude Pro billed annually: $17/month instead of $20OpenAI Codex Freemium
OpenAI's coding agent for the terminal, IDE and cloud, included with ChatGPT plans
OpenCode Open source
Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider
Orca Open source
An ADE for running fleets of coding agents in parallel worktrees, from desktop or mobile