Amp vs Tutti (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how Amp and Tutti stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Amp

Frontier coding agent for the terminal and editor, from the makers of Sourcegraph

8.2 /10

Pricing: Free plan, paid from $20/mo

Pros

Strong results on hard, multi-step tasks
Shared threads for team review
Subagents and AGENTS.md built in

Cons

Usage-based costs add up on large tasks
Fewer configuration knobs by design

Visit Amp ↗

Tutti

Multi-user, multi-agent real-time collaboration space for humans and coding agents

7.0 /10

Pricing: Freemium

Pros

Addresses a real pain point: manual context-copying between separate agent tools
Genuine open-source edition alongside an optional hosted multi-user version
Active development (5,300+ commits) and a real, if moderate, community

Cons

Multi-user cloud edition (Tutti VM) needs its own access-control review for sensitive code
Value depends on already running multiple different coding agents side by side

Visit Tutti ↗

Amp vs Tutti at a glance

	Amp	Tutti
Editor score	8.2 / 10	7.0 / 10
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Starting price	$20/mo	Free
Reader upvotes	0	0
Best for	terminal, agent	multi-agent, collaboration, claude-code
Agent Skills support	Yes	No
Subagents support	Yes	No
MCP support	Yes	No
AGENTS.md support	Yes	No
Plugins support	Yes	No
Hooks support	No	No
Rules support	No	No
Agent skills in this directory	47	0
Subagents & agents in this directory	9	3
MCP servers in this directory	72	0

Our pick

Amp edges it with a score of 8.2 versus 7.0. Amp is the better fit if you value: strong results on hard, multi-step tasks, shared threads for team review. Choose Tutti instead if you need: addresses a real pain point: manual context-copying between separate agent tools, genuine open-source edition alongside an optional hosted multi-user version.