cc-haha vs OpenCode (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular terminal coding agents. Here is how cc-haha and OpenCode stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

cc-haha

Local-first desktop workspace for Claude Code and other agents, with worktrees and diffs

7.0 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

Strong review workflow: worktrees, per-file diffs, and an embedded browser preview
Supports multiple model providers, not just Claude
Large, genuinely active community (14.6k stars, 2,000+ commits, active issues/PRs)

Cons

Many third-party chat integrations (Telegram, WeChat, etc.) widen the permissions/attack surface to review
Unsigned installers on some platforms require manual security approval to run

Visit cc-haha ↗

OpenCode

Open-source terminal coding agent that works with any model provider

8.4 /10

Pricing: Open source

Pros

Free and open source; any model provider
Claude Code-style extensibility
Fast, well-designed terminal UI

Cons

You pay the model provider directly; costs vary with usage
Smaller community of ready-made extensions

Visit OpenCode ↗

cc-haha vs OpenCode at a glance

	cc-haha	OpenCode
Editor score	7.0 / 10	8.4 / 10
Pricing model	Open source	Open source
Starting price	Free	Free
Reader upvotes	0	1
Best for	claude-code, electron, desktop	terminal, open source, byok
Agent Skills support	No	Yes
Subagents support	No	Yes
MCP support	No	Yes
AGENTS.md support	No	Yes
Plugins support	No	Yes
Hooks support	No	No
Rules support	No	No
Agent skills in this directory	0	53
Subagents & agents in this directory	3	26
MCP servers in this directory	0	73

Our pick

OpenCode edges it with a score of 8.4 versus 7.0. OpenCode is the better fit if you value: free and open source; any model provider, claude code-style extensibility. Choose cc-haha instead if you need: strong review workflow: worktrees, per-file diffs, and an embedded browser preview, supports multiple model providers, not just claude.