Try “Claude Code skills”, “MCP servers for Cursor” or “Codex” · Esc to close

Cursor vs Trae (2026): Which Vibe Coding App Is Better?

Both are popular AI code editors. Here is how Cursor and Trae stack up on price, strengths and weaknesses, and which one we would pick.

Cursor

The AI-first code editor with agents, background agents and fast autocomplete

9.0 /10

Pricing: Free plan, paid from $20/mo

Pros

  • Best-in-class autocomplete plus a capable agent
  • Familiar VS Code interface and extensions
  • Background agents in the cloud

Cons

  • Usage-based pricing on top of the plan can surprise heavy users
  • Referral programme discontinued
Visit Cursor ↗

Trae

AI IDE from ByteDance with builder and chat modes

7.2 /10

Pricing: Free plan, paid from $20/mo

Pros

  • Low price and a free plan
  • Builder mode for whole features
  • MCP support

Cons

  • Data-handling questions for some organisations
  • Smaller community
Visit Trae ↗

Cursor vs Trae at a glance

CursorTrae
Editor score9.0 / 107.2 / 10
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$20/mo$20/mo
Reader upvotes00
Best foreditor, ideeditor
Agent Skills supportYesNo
Subagents supportYesNo
MCP supportYesYes
AGENTS.md supportYesYes
Plugins supportYesNo
Hooks supportYesNo
Rules supportYesYes
Agent skills in this directory534
Subagents & agents in this directory235
MCP servers in this directory7472

Our pick

Cursor edges it with a score of 9.0 versus 7.2. Cursor is the better fit if you value: best-in-class autocomplete plus a capable agent, familiar vs code interface and extensions. Choose Trae instead if you need: low price and a free plan, builder mode for whole features.

Other AI code editors to consider

Full ranking →